Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 2/8

Sorry, this content is no longer available

Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 1/8Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 3/8Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 4/8Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 5/8Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 6/8Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 7/8Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 8/8

Log in above or Register Now to be able to post a comment and rate this content.

  Comments   Share  

Top Comments

MiniWarGaming (Over a year ago): - delete
@Untoldmyth: Ouch, that's pretty harsh, and it's sad that you think that is why I wanted to change the rule.

I try to evaluate how a rule feels, not how I can win a playtest.
+3
Vexxus (Over a year ago): - delete
Be careful Matt, like Dave said earlier, you can't re-evaluate rules based on a missed roll or failed attempt! Look at the rule in the context of the whole and base decisions off of singular circumstance! You biggest obstacle in play-testing is that you want to win so badly that your judgement sometimes becomes impaired!
+3

Other Comments

dkcheetos (Over a year ago): - delete
i think you should be using more of a scatter system from 40k then the deviate system from warmachine.....then you can it on target
Scaler (Over a year ago): - delete
Medics should be able to cure Commanders from the infector. So perhaps on a 50/50 roll with the medic you could heal a commander that has been infected. OR both the medic AND the commander forfeit their action to heal the commander.
cherup (Over a year ago): - delete
I would like to suggest a few tweaks to this scenario. How about every Sqaud and Solo can only Carry one Token, but you name a Place in your Deployment zone, where you can stash your Tokens. Every Token stashed is either not removable by your enemy or counts three times.

Greetings from Germany
CheruP
MiniWarGaming (Over a year ago): - delete
@Vexxus: I agree. However my issue was with how it felt that I was just grabbing forage tokens early on, and the fought later.

However, you are right, you really should wait until the game is over to make evaluations.
Untoldmyth (Over a year ago): - delete
@Vexxus: I see the same thing that is why I say hes a cheater. He changes the rules to accomodate himself
-6
NeilsDaName (Over a year ago): - delete
love the team liquid shirt dan
-Tyranidmaster27- (Over a year ago): - delete
I think in some ways it's better 4 your guys to run off the board because you are 100% sure you'll get that point for the token
About this Content
MiniWarGaming's Avatar Author: MiniWarGaming
Added: May 24, 2012
Rated: 12345 (2)

Matthew and Dan prepare for this epic playtest.

Found in:
More From...
Rules You Got Wrong Warhammer 40k Edition February 25, 2017 Rules You Got Wrong Warhammer 40k Edition February 25, 2017
by MiniWarGaming
In this weekly show we go over the rules that you think we got wrong in our past battle reports.
Lizardmen vs Vampire Counts Warhammer Fantasy Battle Report Old World Wars Ep 212 Lizardmen vs Vampire Counts Warhammer Fantasy Battle Report Old World Wars Ep 212
by MiniWarGaming
Steve's Lizardmen try and hold out vs Luka and his Wraith terror squad of Death.
Lizardmen vs Vampire Counts Warhammer Fantasy Battle Report - Old World Wars Ep 211 Lizardmen vs Vampire Counts Warhammer Fantasy Battle Report - Old World Wars Ep 211
by MiniWarGaming
Luka brings a large unit of Blood Knights to charge Steve's Lizardmen turtle.
Sit and Vault with Josh and Lee - Feb 24, 2017 Sit and Vault with Josh and Lee - Feb 24, 2017
by MiniWarGaming
Josh and Lee continue answering all of your questions about wargaming and life in general.
Sit and Talk with Josh and Lee - Feb 24, 2017 Sit and Talk with Josh and Lee - Feb 24, 2017
by MiniWarGaming
Josh and Lee sit down to answer all of your questions in this weeks Sit and Talk.