Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 2/8

HOME

DARK POTENTIAL

SHOWS

Follow:

Want a Free DVD? Then click here! (Limited Quantities)

Dark Potential Playtest Session 6 - New Scenario Part 2/8

Download (Vault Members Only)

Dark Potential Forums

Log in above or Register Now to be able to post a comment and rate this content.

Comments

Top Comments

MiniWarGaming (12 months ago): - delete

@Untoldmyth: Ouch, that's pretty harsh, and it's sad that you think that is why I wanted to change the rule.

I try to evaluate how a rule feels, not how I can win a playtest.

Vexxus (12 months ago): - delete

Be careful Matt, like Dave said earlier, you can't re-evaluate rules based on a missed roll or failed attempt! Look at the rule in the context of the whole and base decisions off of singular circumstance! You biggest obstacle in play-testing is that you want to win so badly that your judgement sometimes becomes impaired!

Other Comments

dkcheetos (12 months ago): - delete

i think you should be using more of a scatter system from 40k then the deviate system from warmachine.....then you can it on target

Scaler (12 months ago): - delete

Medics should be able to cure Commanders from the infector. So perhaps on a 50/50 roll with the medic you could heal a commander that has been infected. OR both the medic AND the commander forfeit their action to heal the commander.

cherup (12 months ago): - delete

I would like to suggest a few tweaks to this scenario. How about every Sqaud and Solo can only Carry one Token, but you name a Place in your Deployment zone, where you can stash your Tokens. Every Token stashed is either not removable by your enemy or counts three times.

Greetings from Germany
CheruP

MiniWarGaming (12 months ago): - delete

@Vexxus: I agree. However my issue was with how it felt that I was just grabbing forage tokens early on, and the fought later.

However, you are right, you really should wait until the game is over to make evaluations.

MiniWarGaming (12 months ago): - delete

@Untoldmyth: Ouch, that's pretty harsh, and it's sad that you think that is why I wanted to change the rule.

I try to evaluate how a rule feels, not how I can win a playtest.