40k 6th Edition Batrep: Dakka Jets VS Flying Monstrous Creature Part 1/2

Tweet

Download (Vault Members Only)

Log in above or Register Now to be able to post a comment and rate this content.

Comments

Share

Top Comments
	midas (10 months ago): - delete GW screwd their own rules AGAIN? +9
	-Tyranidmaster27- (10 months ago): - delete Flyers HAVE to start in reserve!!! +6
	Kobold138 (10 months ago): - delete In the german "errata" is written that a deamon prince with wings upgrade is a Flying Mostrous Creature. I thing they made a mistake in the english errata +5
	Kassius (10 months ago): - delete Daemon Prince is not an infantry unit, ergo the errata doesn't affect him, he's just a Flying Monstrous Creature +3
	Finalstand (10 months ago): - delete Posted this comment on the part 2 video but I figure I'll post it here as well. I found out and I just verified the German FAQ states that a Daemon Prince with wings IS a flying monstrous creature just showing some conflicting rule sets. +2
Other Comments
	RogerWilco99 (10 months ago): - delete Please, please, PLEASE turn down the music!!! I cannot make out half the dialogue in this video which is why I wanted to watch it. Alas, the music is so loud that I have a major problem hearing much of the dialogue. Please get someone who knows what they're doing to mix these. PLEASE -6
	Astroice (10 months ago): - delete They need to make a 40k pc game featuring dakka jets
	Bolter47 (10 months ago): - delete @Sarukin: Rapid Fire at Full Range after moving did make it in the BRB. Nonetheless, you have a point in saying that it's not the Holy Bible of correct rulings.
	heramael (10 months ago): - delete Bolt of Change is not a Melta weapon. It is S8 AP1, but it does not have the Melta special rule.
	Sarukin (10 months ago): - delete The White Dwarf shouldn't be taken to heart, I mean in it it also says you can Rapid Fire the full distance of your weapons, that didn't make it in.
	Killerhamma7 (10 months ago): - delete Did you guys make all of these in one day or are you just always wearing the same shirts?
	Dread-Knight (10 months ago): - delete Zoom against guys without skyfire and they're boned for the most part.
	DaemonMaster (10 months ago): - delete i have both FAQs in my hand and i dont see any thing about jump monstrous creatures have they already redone them again?
	GrimCon (10 months ago): - delete @Nogdakka: Not likely, but Chaos Space Marines are supposed to get a new one soon ...
	Finalstand (10 months ago): - delete Posted this comment on the part 2 video but I figure I'll post it here as well. I found out and I just verified the German FAQ states that a Daemon Prince with wings IS a flying monstrous creature just showing some conflicting rule sets. +2
	Nogdakka (10 months ago): - delete Wait. Are Daemons really getting a new codex soon?
	cherup (10 months ago): - delete FAQ says nothing about Infantry just unit and a Daemon Prince is clearly a unit so it is just a Jump Monstrous Creature
	Kassius (10 months ago): - delete Daemon Prince is not an infantry unit, ergo the errata doesn't affect him, he's just a Flying Monstrous Creature +3
	-Tyranidmaster27- (10 months ago): - delete opps-didn't watch the part 10 seconds after Ignore my last comment
	-Tyranidmaster27- (10 months ago): - delete Flyers HAVE to start in reserve!!! +6
	Lunaraia (10 months ago): - delete FINALLY I GET TO SEE THE DAKKA JETS!!!!
	midas (10 months ago): - delete GW screwd their own rules AGAIN? +9
	Kobold138 (10 months ago): - delete In the german "errata" is written that a deamon prince with wings upgrade is a Flying Mostrous Creature. I thing they made a mistake in the english errata +5

Facebook MySpace Digg del.icio.us orkut Fark StumbleUpon     LiveSpaces

Share the URL: